If it has always been against the law to create an image of the prophet of Islam, Muhammed, then how would anyone know that anyone ever did publish his picture if no one alive today even knows what he looked like since no one was ever allowed to reproduce his image in the first place? I mean, are the rioters suggesting that Mohammed really looks like those ridiculous cartoon images? And if he doesn't look like that then how do they know that it's him? And if they are convinced that it is really what he looked like, wouldn't you think that they'd want to keep that one under wraps? I mean they're not very flattering portraits.
Actually, I think that Muslims just like to riot in an effort to bully through intimidation since they really have nothing else to offer.
Like we didn't see this coming...